Namely the marshal and the huntsman?
it really seems to do nothing but reduce the damage, I mean if it reduces the hipfire reticule on the buccaneer why would it not on these guns?
It doesn't seem to make the reticule smaller when slighty moving either as if you were aiming down sights.... is it an oversight? intentional? if so though, why? those guns would be no more dangerous than the partisan which is reduces the hipfire reticule... I don't understand.